Dream
Self and Sleep Self
...
Dream is felt to be unreal, first, because it ceases and
has no farther validity when we pass from one status of
consciousness to another which is our normal status. But
this is not by itself a sufficient reason: for it may
well be that there are different states of consciousness
each with its own realities; if the consciousness of one
state of things fades back and its contents are lost or,
even when caught in memory, seem to be illusory as soon
as we pass into another state, that would be perfectly
normal, but it would not prove the reality of the state
in which we now are and the unreality of the other which
we have left behind us. If earth circumstances begin to
seem unreal to a soul passing into a different world or
another plane of consciousness, that would not prove their
unreality; similarly, the fact that world-existence seems
unreal to us when we pass into the spiritual silence or
into some Nirvana, does not of itself prove that the cosmos
was all the time an illusion. The world is real to the
consciousness dwelling in it, an unconditioned existence
is real to the consciousness absorbed in Nirvana; that
is all that is established. But the second reason for
refusing credit to our sleep experience is that a dream
is something evanescent without antecedents and without
a sequel; ordinarily, too, it is without any sufficient
coherence or any significance intelligible to our waking
being. If our dreams wore like our waking life an aspect
of coherence, each night taking up and carrying farther
a past continuous and connected sleep-experience as each
day takes up again our waking world-experience, then dreams
would assume to our mind quite another character. There
is therefore no analogy between a dream and waking life;
these are experiences quite different in their character,
validity, order. Our life is accused of evanescence and
often it is accused too, as a whole, of a lack of inner
coherence and significance; but its lack of complete significance
may be due to our lack or limitation of understanding:
actually, when we go within and begin to see it from within,
it assumes a complete connected significance; at the same
time whatever lack of inner coherence was felt before
disappears and we see that it was due to the incoherence
of our own inner seeing and knowledge and was not at all
a character of life. There is no surface incoherence in
life, it rather appears to our minds as a chain of firm
sequences, and, if that is a mental delusion, as is sometimes
alleged, if the sequence is created by our minds and does
not actually exist in life, that does not remove the difference
of the two states of consciousness. For in dream the coherence
given by an observing inner consciousness is absent, and
whatever sense of sequence there is seems to be due to
a vague and false imitation of the connections of waking
life, a subconscious mimesis, but this imitative sequence
is shadowy and imperfect, fails and breaks always and
is often wholly absent. We see too that the dream-consciousness
seems to be wholly devoid of that control which the waking
consciousness exercises to a certain extent over life-circumstances;
it has the Nature-automatism of a subconscient construction
and nothing of the conscious will and organising force
of the evolved mind of the human being. Again the evanescence
of a dream is radical and one dream has no connection
with another; but the evanescence of the waking life is
of details,there is no evidence of evanescence in
the connected totality of world-experience. Our bodies
perish but souls proceed from birth to birth through the
ages: stars and planets may disappear after a lapse of
aeons or of many light-cycles, but universe, cosmic existence
may well be a permanent as it is certainly a continuous
activity; there is nothing to prove that the Infinite
Energy which creates it has an end or a beginning either
of itself or of its action. So far there is too great
a disparateness between dream-life and waking life to
make the analogy applicable.
But
it may be questioned whether our dreams are indeed totally
unreal and without significance, whether they are not a
figure, an image-record or a symbolic transcript or representation
of things that are real. For that we have to examine, however
summarily, the nature of sleep and of dream-phenomena, their
process of origination and their provenance. What happens
in sleep is that our consciousness withdraws from the field
of its waking experiences; it is supposed to be resting,
suspended or in abeyance, but that is a superficial view
of the matter. What is in abeyance is the waking activities,
what is at rest is the surface mind and the normal conscious
action of the bodily part of us; but the inner consciousness
is not suspended, it enters into new inner activities, only
a part of which, a part happening or recorded in something
of us that is near to the surface, we remember. There is
maintained in sleep, thus near the surface, an obscure subconscious
element which is a receptacle or passage for our dream experiences
and itself also a dream-builder; but behind it is the depth
and mass of the subliminal, the totality of our concealed
inner being and consciousness which is of quite another
order. Normally it is a subconscient part in us, intermediate
between consciousness and pure inconscience, that sends
up through this surface layer its formations in the shape
of dreams, constructions marked by an apparent inconsequence
and incoherence. Many of these are fugitive structures built
upon circumstances of our present life selected apparently
at random and surrounded with a phantasy of variation; others
call back the past, or rather selected circumstances and
persons of the past, as a starting-point for similar fleeting
edifices. There are other dreams of the subconscious which
seem to be pure phantasy without any such initiation or
basis; but the new method of psycho-analysis, trying to
look for the first time into our dreams with some kind of
scientific understanding, has established in them a system
of meanings, a key to things in us which need to be known
and handled by the waking consciousness; this of itself
changes the whole character and value of our dream-experience.
It begins to look as if there were something real behind
it and as if too that something were an element of no mean
practical importance.
But
the subconscious is not our sole dream-builder. The subconscious
in us is the extreme border of our secret inner existence
where it meets the Inconscient, it is a degree of our being
in which the Inconscient struggles into a half consciousness;
the surface physical consciousness also, when it sinks back
from the waking level and retrogresses towards the Inconscient,
retires into this intermediate subconscience. Or, from another
viewpoint, this nether part of us may be described as the
antechamber of the Inconscient through which its formations
rise into our waking or our subliminal being. When we sleep
and the surface physical part of us, which is in its first
origin here an output from the Inconscient, relapses towards
the originating inconscience, it enters into this subconscious
element, antechamber or substratum, and there it finds the
impressions of its past or persistent habits of mind and
experiences,for all have left their mark on our subconscious
part and have there a power of recurrence. In its effect
on our waking self this recurrence often takes the form
of a reassertion of old habits, impulses dormant or suppressed,
rejected elements of the nature, or it comes up as some
other not so easily recognisable, some peculiar disguised
or subtle result of these suppressed or rejected but not
erased impulses or elements. In the dream-consciousness
the phenomenon is an apparently fanciful construction, a
composite of figures and movements built upon or around
the buried impressions with a sense in them that escapes
the waking intelligence because it has no clue to the subconscient's
system of significances. After a time this subconscious
activity appears to sink back into complete inconscience
and we speak of this state as deep dreamless sleep; thence
we emerge again into the dream-shallows or return to the
waking surface.
But,
in fact, in what we call dreamless sleep, we have gone into
a profounder and denser layer of the subconscient, a state
too involved, too immersed or too obscure, dull and heavy
to bring to the surface its structures, and we are dreaming
there but unable to grasp or retain in the recording layer
of subconscience these more obscure dream-figures. Or else,
it may be, the part of our mind which still remains active
in the sleep of the body has entered into the inner domains
of our being, the subliminal mental, the subliminal vital,
the subtle-physical, and is there lost to all active connection
with the surface parts of us. If we are still in the nearer
depths of these regions, the surface subconscient which
is our sleep-wakefulness records something of what we experience
in these depths; but it records it in its own transcription,
often marred by characteristic incoherences and always,
even when most coherent, deformed or cast into figures drawn
from the world of waking experience. But if we have gone
deeper inward, the record fails or cannot be recovered and
we have the illusion of dreamlessness; but the activity
of the inner dream consciousness continues behind the veil
of the now mute and inactive subconscient surface. This
continued dream activity is revealed to us when we become
more inwardly conscious, for then we get into connection
with the heavier and deeper subconscient stratum and can
be aware,at the time or by a retracing or recovering
through memory,of what happened when we sank into
these torpid depths. It is possible too to become conscious
deeper within our subliminal selves and we are then aware
of experiences on other planes of our being or even in supraphysical
worlds to which sleep gives us a right of secret entry.
A transcript of such experiences reaches us; but the transcriber
here is not the subconscious, it is the subliminal, a greater
dream-builder.
If
the subliminal thus comes to the front in our dream-consciousness,
there is sometimes an activity of our subliminal intelligence,dream
becomes a series of thoughts, often strangely or vividly
figured, problems are solved which our waking consciousness
could not solve, warnings, premonitions, indications of
the future, veridical dreams replace the normal subconscious
incoherence. There can come also a structure of symbol-images,
some of a mental character, some of a vital nature: the
former are precise in their figures, clear in their significance;
the latter are often complex and baffling to our waking
consciousness, but, if we can seize the clue, they reveal
their own sense and peculiar system of coherence. Finally,
there can come to us the records of happenings seen or experienced
by us on other planes of our own being or of universal being
into which we enter: these have sometimes, like the symbolic
dreams, a strong bearing on our own inner and outer life
or the life of others, reveal elements of our or their mental
being and life-being or disclose influences on them of which
our waking self is totally ignorant; but sometimes they
have no such bearing and are purely records of other organised
systems of consciousness independent of our physical existence.
The subconscious dreams constitute the bulk of our most
ordinary sleep-experience and they are those which we usually
remember; but sometimes the subliminal builder is able to
impress our sleep consciousness sufficiently to stamp his
activities on our waking memory. If we develop our inner
being, live more inwardly than most men do, then the balance
is changed and a larger dream-consciousness opens before
us; our dreams can take on a subliminal and no longer a
subconscious character and can assume a reality and significance.
It
is even possible to become wholly conscious in sleep and
follow throughout from beginning to end or over large stretches
the stages of our dream-experience; it is found that then
we are aware of ourselves passing from state after state
of consciousness to a brief period of luminous and peaceful
dreamless rest, which is the true restorer of the energies
of the waking nature, and then returning by the same way
to the waking consciousness. It is normal, as we thus pass
from state to state, to let the previous experiences slip
away from us; in the return only the more vivid or those
nearest to the waking surface are remembered: but this can
be remedied,a greater retention is possible or the
power can be developed of going back in memory from dream
to dream, from state to state, till the whole is once more
before us. A coherent knowledge of sleep-life, though difficult
to achieve or to keep established, is possible.
Our
subliminal self is not, like our surface physical being,
an outcome of the energy of the Inconscient; it is a meeting-place
of the consciousness that emerges from below by evolution
and the consciousness that has descended from above for
involution. There is in it an inner mind, an inner vital
being of ourselves, an inner or subtle-physical being larger
than our outer being and nature. This inner existence is
the concealed origin of almost all in our surface self that
is not a construction of the first inconscient World-Energy
or a natural developed functioning of our surface consciousness
or a reaction of it to impacts from the outside universal
Nature,and even in this construction, these functionings,
these reactions the subliminal takes part and exercises
on them a considerable influence. There is here a consciousness
which has a power of direct contact with the universal unlike
the mostly indirect contacts which our surface being maintains
with the universe through the sense-mind and the senses.
There are here inner senses, a subliminal sight, touch,
hearing; but these subtle senses are rather channels of
the inner being's direct consciousness of things than its
informants: the subliminal is not dependent on its senses
for its knowledge, they only give a form to its direct experience
of objects; they do not, so much as in waking mind, convey
forms of objects for the mind's documentation or as the
starting-point or basis for an indirect constructive experience.
The subliminal has the right of entry into the mental and
vital and subtle-physical planes of the universal consciousness,
it is not confined to the material plane and the physical
world; it possesses means of communication with the worlds
of being which the descent towards involution created in
its passage and with all corresponding planes or worlds
that may have arisen or been constructed to serve the purpose
of the re-ascent from Inconscience to Superconscience. It
is into this large realm of interior existence that our
mind and vital being retire when they withdraw from the
surface activities whether by sleep or inward-drawn concentration
or by the inner plunge of trance.
Our
waking state is unaware of its connection with the subliminal
being, although it receives from it,but without any
knowledge of the place of origin,the inspirations,
intuitions, ideas, will-suggestions, sense-suggestions,
urges to action that rise from below or from behind our
limited surface existence. Sleep like trance opens the gate
of the subliminal to us; for in sleep, as in trance, we
retire behind the veil of the limited waking personality
and it is behind this veil that the subliminal has its existence.
But we receive the records of our sleep experience through
dream and in dream figures and not in that condition which
might be called an inner waking and which is the most accessible
form of the trance state, nor through the supernormal clarities
of vision and other more luminous and concrete ways of communication
developed by the inner subliminal cognition when it gets
into habitual or occasional conscious connection with our
waking self. The subliminal, with the subconscious as an
annexe of itself,for the subconscious is also part
of the behind-the-veil entity,is the seer of inner
things and of supraphysical experiences; the surface subconscious
is only a transcriber. It is for this reason that the Upanishad
describes the subliminal being as the Dream Self because
it is normally in dreams, visions, absorbed states of inner
experience that we enter into and are part of its experiences,just
as it describes the superconscient as the Sleep Self because
normally all mental or sensory experiences cease when we
enter this superconscience. For in the deeper trance into
which the touch of the superconscient plunges our mentality,
no record from it or transcript of its contents can normally
reach us; it is only by an especial or an unusual development,
in a supernormal condition or through a break or rift in
our confined normality, that we can be on the surface conscious
of the contacts or messages of the Superconscience. But,
in spite of these figurative names of dream-state and sleep-state,
the field of both these states of consciousness was clearly
regarded as a field of reality no less than that of the
waking state in which our movements of perceptive consciousness
are a record or transcript of physical things and of our
contacts with the physical universe. No doubt, all the three
states can be classed as parts of an illusion, our experiences
of them can be ranked together as constructions of an illusory
consciousness, our waking state no less illusory than our
dream state or sleep-state, since the only true truth or
real reality is the incommunicable Self or One-Existence
(Atman, Adwaita) which is the fourth state of the Self described
by the Vedanta. But it is equally possible to regard and
rank them together as three different orders of one Reality
or as three states of consciousness in which is embodied
our contact with three different grades of self-experience
and world-experience.
...
-
Sri Aurobindo